Re: Creating compressed backing_store as swapfile

[Austin S. Hemmelgarn]

On 11/5/2018 11:53 AM, valdis.kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:28:49 -0500, "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" said:
>
> > Also, it's probably worth noting that BTRFS doesn't need to decompress
> > the entire file to read or write blocks in the middle, it splits the
> > file into 128k blocks and compresses each of those independent of the
> > others, so it can just decompress the 128k block that holds the actual
> > block that's needed.
>
> Presumably it does something sane with block allocation for the now-compressed
> 128K that's presumably much smaller.  Also, that limits the damage from writing to
> the middle of a compression unit....
>
> That *does* however increase the memory requirement - you can OOM or
> deadlock if your read/write from the swap needs an additional 128K for the
> compression buffer at an inconvenient time...
Indeed, and I can't really comment on how it might behave under those 
circumstances (the systems I did the testing on never saw memory 
pressure quite _that_ bad, and I had them set up to swap things out 
pretty early and really aggressively).