Re: [PATCH] docs: Introduce deprecated APIs list

From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Wed Oct 17 2018 - 19:34:22 EST


On 10/17/18 3:41 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/17/18 3:37 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 10/17/18 3:00 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 16 Oct 2018, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On 10/16/18 7:17 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>>>> As discussed in the "API replacement/deprecation" thread[1], this
>>>>>> makes an effort to document what things shouldn't get (re)added to the
>>>>>> kernel, by introducing Documentation/process/deprecated.rst. It also
>>>>>> adds the overflow kerndoc to ReST output, and tweaks the struct_size()
>>>>>> documentation to parse correctly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/2018-September/005282.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Documentation/driver-api/basics.rst | 3 +
>>>>>> Documentation/process/deprecated.rst | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> Documentation/process/index.rst | 1 +
>>>>>> include/linux/overflow.h | 2 +-
>>>>>> 4 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/overflow.h b/include/linux/overflow.h
>>>>>> index 40b48e2133cb..2f224f43dd06 100644
>>>>>> --- a/include/linux/overflow.h
>>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/overflow.h
>>>>>> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static inline __must_check size_t __ab_c_size(size_t n, size_t size, size_t c)
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /**
>>>>>> - * struct_size() - Calculate size of structure with trailing array.
>>>>>> + * function struct_size() - Calculate size of structure with trailing array.
>>>>>
>>>>> That syntax is not explained nor documented in Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is the root problem that the function name begins with "struct"?
>>>>> Please explain in the patch description.
>>>>
>>>> Indeed, shouldn't be needed.
>>
>> I actually thought the problem was with it not knowing how to deal
>> with struct_size() being a macro instead of a real function.
>>
>>> Well, this is just a guess (no testing), but in scripts/kernel-doc (at line
>>> 1907 in 4.19-rc8), we can see:
>>>
>>> if ($identifier =~ m/^struct/) {
>>> $decl_type = 'struct';
>>> } elsif ($identifier =~ m/^union/) {
>>> $decl_type = 'union';
>>> } elsif ($identifier =~ m/^enum/) {
>>> $decl_type = 'enum';
>>> } elsif ($identifier =~ m/^typedef/) {
>>> $decl_type = 'typedef';
>>> } else {
>>> $decl_type = 'function';
>>> }
>>>
>>> I wouldn't be surprised if a function named "struct_size" looks like a
>>> type struct. Maybe it needs to be more strict, with either a space or
>>> word boundary at the end of each type string. E.g.:
>>>
>>> if ($identifier =~ m/^struct\b/) {
>>> $decl_type = 'struct';
>>> } elsif ($identifier =~ m/^union\b/) {
>>> $decl_type = 'union';
>>> } elsif ($identifier =~ m/^enum\b/) {
>>> $decl_type = 'enum';
>>> } elsif ($identifier =~ m/^typedef\b/) {
>>> $decl_type = 'typedef';
>>> } else {
>>> $decl_type = 'function';
>>> }
>>
>> But I see it's actually the prefix! :P
>>
>> Using the above code fixes it for me. Can you send this fix with my
>> Tested-by, and I'll spin a v2 of my "deprecated.rst" patch without the
>> overflow.h change?
>
> OK, but I'll have to first test for unexpected consequences of it.
> (i.e., run full docs build with and without the patch)

I've tested it successfully. I'll send it out later tonight. (-EBUSY now)

--
~Randy