Re: [PATCH 0/3] find_next_iomem_res() fixes

[lijiang]

å 2018å09æ25æ 06:14, Bjorn Helgaas åé:
> Hi Lianbo,
> 
> These three patches are a possible replacement for your first patch
> ("[PATCH 1/3 v3] resource: fix an error which walks through iomem
> resources").
> 
> I think the interface of find_next_iomem_res() can be improved to make
> the code easier to read and also avoid the errors you're fixing.
> 
> I can't test these, so they've only been compiled.  If you can test
> them and if you like them, feel free to incorporate them into your
> series.  If not, just drop them (but please at least fix the same
> error in walk_system_ram_range()).
> 
Hi, Bjorn
Sorry for my late reply about this. No need to incorporate them into
my patch series, you might freely submit them to upstream.

I will test your patches whether it can also work well for my case, and
you will get feedback about my test later.

Thanks.
Lianbo

> ---
> 
> Bjorn Helgaas (3):
>       x86/kexec: Correct KEXEC_BACKUP_SRC_END off-by-one error
>       resource: Include resource end in walk_*() interfaces
>       resource: Fix find_next_iomem_res() iteration issue
> 
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h |    2 -
>  kernel/resource.c            |   96 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
>