Re: [PATCH v4] block/loop: Serialize ioctl operations.

From: Jan Kara
Date: Mon Sep 24 2018 - 08:31:23 EST

Next message: Greg Kroah-Hartman: "[PATCH 4.18 075/235] efi/arm: preserve early mapping of UEFI memory map longer for BGRT"
Previous message: Greg Kroah-Hartman: "[PATCH 4.18 074/235] reset: imx7: Fix always writing bits as 0"
In reply to: Tetsuo Handa: "[PATCH v4] block/loop: Serialize ioctl operations."
Next in thread: Tetsuo Handa: "Re: [PATCH v4] block/loop: Serialize ioctl operations."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon 24-09-18 19:29:10, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2018/09/24 7:03, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 09:39:02PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> >> Hello, Ming Lei.
> >>
> >> I'd like to hear your comment on this patch regarding the ordering of
> >> stopping kernel thread.
> >>
> >> > In order to enforce this strategy, this patch inversed
> >> > loop_reread_partitions() and loop_unprepare_queue() in loop_clr_fd().
> >> > I don't know whether it breaks something, but I don't have testcases.
> >>
> >> Until 3.19, kthread_stop(lo->lo_thread) was called before
> >> ioctl_by_bdev(bdev, BLKRRPART, 0) is called.
> >> During 4.0 to 4.3, the loop module was using "kloopd" workqueue.
> >> But since 4.4, loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev) is called before
> >> loop_unprepare_queue(lo) is called. And this patch is trying to change to
> >> call loop_unprepare_queue() before loop_reread_partitions() is called.
> >> Is there some reason we need to preserve current ordering?
> >
> > IMO, both the two orders are fine, and what matters is that 'lo->lo_state'
> > is updated before loop_reread_partitions(), then any IO from loop_reread_partitions
> > will be failed, so it shouldn't be a big deal wrt. the order between
> > loop_reread_partitions() and loop_unprepare_queue().
>
> OK. Thank you. Here is v4 patch (only changelog was updated).
> Andrew, can we test this patch in the -mm tree?
>
> From 2278250ac8c5b912f7eb7af55e36ed40e2f7116b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 18:58:37 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH v4] block/loop: Serialize ioctl operations.
>
> syzbot is reporting NULL pointer dereference [1] which is caused by
> race condition between ioctl(loop_fd, LOOP_CLR_FD, 0) versus
> ioctl(other_loop_fd, LOOP_SET_FD, loop_fd) due to traversing other
> loop devices without holding corresponding locks.
>
> syzbot is also reporting circular locking dependency between bdev->bd_mutex
> and lo->lo_ctl_mutex [2] which is caused by calling blkdev_reread_part()
> with lock held.

Thanks for looking into the loop crashes Tetsuo. I was looking into the
loop code and trying to understand how your patch fixes them but I've
failed. Can you please elaborate a bit on how exactly LOOP_CLR_FD and
LOOP_SET_FD race to hit NULL pointer dereference? I don't really see the
code traversing other loop devices as you mention in your changelog so I'm
probably missing something. Thanks.

Honza

>
> Since ioctl() request on loop devices is not frequent operation, we don't
> need fine grained locking. Let's use global lock and simplify the locking
> order.
>
> Strategy is that the global lock is held upon entry of ioctl() request,
> and release it before either starting operations which might deadlock or
> leaving ioctl() request. After the global lock is released, current thread
> no longer uses "struct loop_device" memory because it might be modified
> by next ioctl() request which was waiting for current ioctl() request.
>
> In order to enforce this strategy, this patch inverted
> loop_reread_partitions() and loop_unprepare_queue() in loop_clr_fd().
> According to Ming Lei, calling loop_unprepare_queue() before
> loop_reread_partitions() (like we did until 3.19) is fine.
>
> Since this patch serializes using global lock, race bugs should no longer
> exist. Thus, it will be easy to test whether this patch broke something.
> Since syzbot is reporting various bugs [3] where a race in the loop module
> is suspected, let's check whether this patch affects these bugs too.
>
> [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=f3cfe26e785d85f9ee259f385515291d21bd80a3
> [2] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=bf154052f0eea4bc7712499e4569505907d15889
> [3] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=b3c7e1440aa8ece16bf557dbac427fdff1dad9d6
>
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+bf89c128e05dd6c62523@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+4684a000d5abdade83fac55b1e7d1f935ef1936e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/block/loop.c | 231 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> drivers/block/loop.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index ea9debf..a7058ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -83,11 +83,50 @@
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>
> static DEFINE_IDR(loop_index_idr);
> -static DEFINE_MUTEX(loop_index_mutex);
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(loop_mutex);
> +static void *loop_mutex_owner; /* == __mutex_owner(&loop_mutex) */
>
> static int max_part;
> static int part_shift;
>
> +/*
> + * lock_loop - Lock loop_mutex.
> + */
> +static void lock_loop(void)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&loop_mutex);
> + loop_mutex_owner = current;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * lock_loop_killable - Lock loop_mutex unless killed.
> + */
> +static int lock_loop_killable(void)
> +{
> + int err = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_mutex);
> +
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + loop_mutex_owner = current;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * unlock_loop - Unlock loop_mutex as needed.
> + *
> + * Explicitly call this function before calling fput() or blkdev_reread_part()
> + * in order to avoid circular lock dependency. After this function is called,
> + * current thread is no longer allowed to access "struct loop_device" memory,
> + * for another thread would access that memory as soon as loop_mutex is held.
> + */
> +static void unlock_loop(void)
> +{
> + if (loop_mutex_owner == current) {
> + loop_mutex_owner = NULL;
> + mutex_unlock(&loop_mutex);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int transfer_xor(struct loop_device *lo, int cmd,
> struct page *raw_page, unsigned raw_off,
> struct page *loop_page, unsigned loop_off,
> @@ -630,7 +669,12 @@ static void loop_reread_partitions(struct loop_device *lo,
> struct block_device *bdev)
> {
> int rc;
> + /* Save variables which might change after unlock_loop() is called. */
> + char filename[sizeof(lo->lo_file_name)];
> + const int num = lo->lo_number;
>
> + memmove(filename, lo->lo_file_name, sizeof(filename));
> + unlock_loop();
> /*
> * bd_mutex has been held already in release path, so don't
> * acquire it if this function is called in such case.
> @@ -645,7 +689,7 @@ static void loop_reread_partitions(struct loop_device *lo,
> rc = blkdev_reread_part(bdev);
> if (rc)
> pr_warn("%s: partition scan of loop%d (%s) failed (rc=%d)\n",
> - __func__, lo->lo_number, lo->lo_file_name, rc);
> + __func__, num, filename, rc);
> }
>
> static inline int is_loop_device(struct file *file)
> @@ -692,6 +736,7 @@ static int loop_change_fd(struct loop_device *lo, struct block_device *bdev,
> struct file *file, *old_file;
> int error;
>
> + lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
> error = -ENXIO;
> if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
> goto out;
> @@ -728,12 +773,14 @@ static int loop_change_fd(struct loop_device *lo, struct block_device *bdev,
> loop_update_dio(lo);
> blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
>
> - fput(old_file);
> if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN)
> - loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev);
> + loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev); /* calls unlock_loop() */
> + unlock_loop();
> + fput(old_file);
> return 0;
>
> out_putf:
> + unlock_loop();
> fput(file);
> out:
> return error;
> @@ -911,6 +958,7 @@ static int loop_set_fd(struct loop_device *lo, fmode_t mode,
> int error;
> loff_t size;
>
> + lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
> /* This is safe, since we have a reference from open(). */
> __module_get(THIS_MODULE);
>
> @@ -969,19 +1017,21 @@ static int loop_set_fd(struct loop_device *lo, fmode_t mode,
> set_blocksize(bdev, S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode) ?
> block_size(inode->i_bdev) : PAGE_SIZE);
>
> + /*
> + * Grab the block_device to prevent its destruction after we
> + * put /dev/loopXX inode. Later in loop_clr_fd() we bdput(bdev).
> + */
> + bdgrab(bdev);
> +
> lo->lo_state = Lo_bound;
> if (part_shift)
> lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN;
> if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN)
> - loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev);
> -
> - /* Grab the block_device to prevent its destruction after we
> - * put /dev/loopXX inode. Later in loop_clr_fd() we bdput(bdev).
> - */
> - bdgrab(bdev);
> + loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev); /* calls unlock_loop() */
> return 0;
>
> out_putf:
> + unlock_loop();
> fput(file);
> out:
> /* This is safe: open() is still holding a reference. */
> @@ -1031,7 +1081,9 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
> struct file *filp = lo->lo_backing_file;
> gfp_t gfp = lo->old_gfp_mask;
> struct block_device *bdev = lo->lo_device;
> + bool reread;
>
> + lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
> if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
> return -ENXIO;
>
> @@ -1047,7 +1099,6 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
> */
> if (atomic_read(&lo->lo_refcnt) > 1) {
> lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR;
> - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1093,20 +1144,14 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
> /* This is safe: open() is still holding a reference. */
> module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
> -
> - if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN && bdev)
> - loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev);
> + reread = (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN) && bdev;
> lo->lo_flags = 0;
> if (!part_shift)
> lo->lo_disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
> loop_unprepare_queue(lo);
> - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> - /*
> - * Need not hold lo_ctl_mutex to fput backing file.
> - * Calling fput holding lo_ctl_mutex triggers a circular
> - * lock dependency possibility warning as fput can take
> - * bd_mutex which is usually taken before lo_ctl_mutex.
> - */
> + if (reread)
> + loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev); /* calls unlock_loop() */
> + unlock_loop();
> fput(filp);
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1196,7 +1241,7 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
> !(lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN)) {
> lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN;
> lo->lo_disk->flags &= ~GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
> - loop_reread_partitions(lo, lo->lo_device);
> + loop_reread_partitions(lo, lo->lo_device); /* calls unlock_loop() */
> }
>
> return err;
> @@ -1205,14 +1250,13 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
> static int
> loop_get_status(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_info64 *info)
> {
> - struct file *file;
> + struct path path;
> struct kstat stat;
> int ret;
>
> - if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound) {
> - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> + lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
> + if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
> return -ENXIO;
> - }
>
> memset(info, 0, sizeof(*info));
> info->lo_number = lo->lo_number;
> @@ -1229,17 +1273,17 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
> lo->lo_encrypt_key_size);
> }
>
> - /* Drop lo_ctl_mutex while we call into the filesystem. */
> - file = get_file(lo->lo_backing_file);
> - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> - ret = vfs_getattr(&file->f_path, &stat, STATX_INO,
> - AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT);
> + /* Drop loop_mutex while we call into the filesystem. */
> + path = lo->lo_backing_file->f_path;
> + path_get(&path);
> + unlock_loop();
> + ret = vfs_getattr(&path, &stat, STATX_INO, AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT);
> if (!ret) {
> info->lo_device = huge_encode_dev(stat.dev);
> info->lo_inode = stat.ino;
> info->lo_rdevice = huge_encode_dev(stat.rdev);
> }
> - fput(file);
> + path_put(&path);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -1301,6 +1345,7 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
> struct loop_info info;
> struct loop_info64 info64;
>
> + lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
> if (copy_from_user(&info, arg, sizeof (struct loop_info)))
> return -EFAULT;
> loop_info64_from_old(&info, &info64);
> @@ -1312,6 +1357,7 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
> {
> struct loop_info64 info64;
>
> + lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
> if (copy_from_user(&info64, arg, sizeof (struct loop_info64)))
> return -EFAULT;
> return loop_set_status(lo, &info64);
> @@ -1323,10 +1369,8 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
> struct loop_info64 info64;
> int err;
>
> - if (!arg) {
> - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> + if (!arg)
> return -EINVAL;
> - }
> err = loop_get_status(lo, &info64);
> if (!err)
> err = loop_info64_to_old(&info64, &info);
> @@ -1341,10 +1385,8 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
> struct loop_info64 info64;
> int err;
>
> - if (!arg) {
> - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> + if (!arg)
> return -EINVAL;
> - }
> err = loop_get_status(lo, &info64);
> if (!err && copy_to_user(arg, &info64, sizeof(info64)))
> err = -EFAULT;
> @@ -1354,6 +1396,7 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
>
> static int loop_set_capacity(struct loop_device *lo)
> {
> + lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
> if (unlikely(lo->lo_state != Lo_bound))
> return -ENXIO;
>
> @@ -1363,6 +1406,8 @@ static int loop_set_capacity(struct loop_device *lo)
> static int loop_set_dio(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned long arg)
> {
> int error = -ENXIO;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
> if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
> goto out;
>
> @@ -1376,6 +1421,7 @@ static int loop_set_dio(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned long arg)
>
> static int loop_set_block_size(struct loop_device *lo, unsigned long arg)
> {
> + lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
> if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
> return -ENXIO;
>
> @@ -1398,12 +1444,10 @@ static int lo_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
> unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> {
> struct loop_device *lo = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
> - int err;
> + int err = lock_loop_killable();
>
> - err = mutex_lock_killable_nested(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex, 1);
> if (err)
> - goto out_unlocked;
> -
> + return err;
> switch (cmd) {
> case LOOP_SET_FD:
> err = loop_set_fd(lo, mode, bdev, arg);
> @@ -1412,10 +1456,7 @@ static int lo_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
> err = loop_change_fd(lo, bdev, arg);
> break;
> case LOOP_CLR_FD:
> - /* loop_clr_fd would have unlocked lo_ctl_mutex on success */
> err = loop_clr_fd(lo);
> - if (!err)
> - goto out_unlocked;
> break;
> case LOOP_SET_STATUS:
> err = -EPERM;
> @@ -1425,8 +1466,7 @@ static int lo_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
> break;
> case LOOP_GET_STATUS:
> err = loop_get_status_old(lo, (struct loop_info __user *) arg);
> - /* loop_get_status() unlocks lo_ctl_mutex */
> - goto out_unlocked;
> + break;
> case LOOP_SET_STATUS64:
> err = -EPERM;
> if ((mode & FMODE_WRITE) || capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> @@ -1435,8 +1475,7 @@ static int lo_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
> break;
> case LOOP_GET_STATUS64:
> err = loop_get_status64(lo, (struct loop_info64 __user *) arg);
> - /* loop_get_status() unlocks lo_ctl_mutex */
> - goto out_unlocked;
> + break;
> case LOOP_SET_CAPACITY:
> err = -EPERM;
> if ((mode & FMODE_WRITE) || capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> @@ -1455,9 +1494,7 @@ static int lo_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
> default:
> err = lo->ioctl ? lo->ioctl(lo, cmd, arg) : -EINVAL;
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> -
> -out_unlocked:
> + unlock_loop();
> return err;
> }
>
> @@ -1558,6 +1595,7 @@ struct compat_loop_info {
> struct loop_info64 info64;
> int ret;
>
> + lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
> ret = loop_info64_from_compat(arg, &info64);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> @@ -1571,10 +1609,9 @@ struct compat_loop_info {
> struct loop_info64 info64;
> int err;
>
> - if (!arg) {
> - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> + lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
> + if (!arg)
> return -EINVAL;
> - }
> err = loop_get_status(lo, &info64);
> if (!err)
> err = loop_info64_to_compat(&info64, arg);
> @@ -1589,20 +1626,16 @@ static int lo_compat_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>
> switch(cmd) {
> case LOOP_SET_STATUS:
> - err = mutex_lock_killable(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> - if (!err) {
> + err = lock_loop_killable();
> + if (!err)
> err = loop_set_status_compat(lo,
> (const struct compat_loop_info __user *)arg);
> - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> - }
> break;
> case LOOP_GET_STATUS:
> - err = mutex_lock_killable(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> - if (!err) {
> + err = lock_loop_killable();
> + if (!err)
> err = loop_get_status_compat(lo,
> (struct compat_loop_info __user *)arg);
> - /* loop_get_status() unlocks lo_ctl_mutex */
> - }
> break;
> case LOOP_SET_CAPACITY:
> case LOOP_CLR_FD:
> @@ -1619,6 +1652,7 @@ static int lo_compat_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
> err = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> break;
> }
> + unlock_loop();
> return err;
> }
> #endif
> @@ -1626,37 +1660,30 @@ static int lo_compat_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
> static int lo_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
> {
> struct loop_device *lo;
> - int err = 0;
> + int err = lock_loop_killable();
>
> - mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> lo = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
> - if (!lo) {
> + if (!lo)
> err = -ENXIO;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - atomic_inc(&lo->lo_refcnt);
> -out:
> - mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
> + else
> + atomic_inc(&lo->lo_refcnt);
> + unlock_loop();
> return err;
> }
>
> static void __lo_release(struct loop_device *lo)
> {
> - int err;
> -
> if (atomic_dec_return(&lo->lo_refcnt))
> return;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> + lockdep_assert_held(&loop_mutex);
> if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR) {
> /*
> * In autoclear mode, stop the loop thread
> * and remove configuration after last close.
> */
> - err = loop_clr_fd(lo);
> - if (!err)
> - return;
> + loop_clr_fd(lo);
> } else if (lo->lo_state == Lo_bound) {
> /*
> * Otherwise keep thread (if running) and config,
> @@ -1665,15 +1692,13 @@ static void __lo_release(struct loop_device *lo)
> blk_mq_freeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
> blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
> }
> -
> - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> }
>
> static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
> {
> - mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
> + lock_loop();
> __lo_release(disk->private_data);
> - mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
> + unlock_loop();
> }
>
> static const struct block_device_operations lo_fops = {
> @@ -1712,10 +1737,8 @@ static int unregister_transfer_cb(int id, void *ptr, void *data)
> struct loop_device *lo = ptr;
> struct loop_func_table *xfer = data;
>
> - mutex_lock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> if (lo->lo_encryption == xfer)
> loop_release_xfer(lo);
> - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1727,8 +1750,14 @@ int loop_unregister_transfer(int number)
> if (n == 0 || n >= MAX_LO_CRYPT || (xfer = xfer_funcs[n]) == NULL)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /*
> + * cleanup_cryptoloop() cannot handle errors because it is called
> + * from module_exit(). Thus, don't give up upon SIGKILL here.
> + */
> + lock_loop();
> xfer_funcs[n] = NULL;
> idr_for_each(&loop_index_idr, &unregister_transfer_cb, xfer);
> + unlock_loop();
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1896,7 +1925,6 @@ static int loop_add(struct loop_device **l, int i)
> if (!part_shift)
> disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
> disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_EXT_DEVT;
> - mutex_init(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> atomic_set(&lo->lo_refcnt, 0);
> lo->lo_number = i;
> spin_lock_init(&lo->lo_lock);
> @@ -1972,20 +2000,19 @@ static int loop_lookup(struct loop_device **l, int i)
> static struct kobject *loop_probe(dev_t dev, int *part, void *data)
> {
> struct loop_device *lo;
> - struct kobject *kobj;
> - int err;
> + struct kobject *kobj = NULL;
> + int err = lock_loop_killable();
>
> - mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
> + *part = 0;
> + if (err)
> + return NULL;
> err = loop_lookup(&lo, MINOR(dev) >> part_shift);
> if (err < 0)
> err = loop_add(&lo, MINOR(dev) >> part_shift);
> - if (err < 0)
> - kobj = NULL;
> - else
> + if (err >= 0)
> kobj = get_disk_and_module(lo->lo_disk);
> - mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
> + unlock_loop();
>
> - *part = 0;
> return kobj;
> }
>
> @@ -1993,9 +2020,11 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> unsigned long parm)
> {
> struct loop_device *lo;
> - int ret = -ENOSYS;
> + int ret = lock_loop_killable();
>
> - mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + ret = -ENOSYS;
> switch (cmd) {
> case LOOP_CTL_ADD:
> ret = loop_lookup(&lo, parm);
> @@ -2009,21 +2038,17 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> ret = loop_lookup(&lo, parm);
> if (ret < 0)
> break;
> - ret = mutex_lock_killable(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> if (ret)
> break;
> if (lo->lo_state != Lo_unbound) {
> ret = -EBUSY;
> - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> break;
> }
> if (atomic_read(&lo->lo_refcnt) > 0) {
> ret = -EBUSY;
> - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> break;
> }
> lo->lo_disk->private_data = NULL;
> - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
> idr_remove(&loop_index_idr, lo->lo_number);
> loop_remove(lo);
> break;
> @@ -2033,7 +2058,7 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> break;
> ret = loop_add(&lo, -1);
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
> + unlock_loop();
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -2117,10 +2142,10 @@ static int __init loop_init(void)
> THIS_MODULE, loop_probe, NULL, NULL);
>
> /* pre-create number of devices given by config or max_loop */
> - mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
> + lock_loop();
> for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
> loop_add(&lo, i);
> - mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
> + unlock_loop();
>
> printk(KERN_INFO "loop: module loaded\n");
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.h b/drivers/block/loop.h
> index 4d42c7a..af75a5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.h
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.h
> @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ struct loop_device {
>
> spinlock_t lo_lock;
> int lo_state;
> - struct mutex lo_ctl_mutex;
> struct kthread_worker worker;
> struct task_struct *worker_task;
> bool use_dio;
> --
> 1.8.3.1
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR

Next message: Greg Kroah-Hartman: "[PATCH 4.18 075/235] efi/arm: preserve early mapping of UEFI memory map longer for BGRT"
Previous message: Greg Kroah-Hartman: "[PATCH 4.18 074/235] reset: imx7: Fix always writing bits as 0"
In reply to: Tetsuo Handa: "[PATCH v4] block/loop: Serialize ioctl operations."
Next in thread: Tetsuo Handa: "Re: [PATCH v4] block/loop: Serialize ioctl operations."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]