Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add support for QCOM cpufreq HW driver

From: Taniya Das
Date: Sun Sep 23 2018 - 05:41:16 EST


Hello Matthias,

Thanks for your review comments.

On 8/29/2018 11:31 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
Hi Taniya,

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:12:50PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
The CPUfreq HW present in some QCOM chipsets offloads the steps necessary
for changing the frequency of CPUs. The driver implements the cpufreq
driver interface for this hardware engine.

Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 11 ++
drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 348 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 360 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
index 0cd8eb7..93a9d72 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
@@ -298,3 +298,14 @@ config ARM_PXA2xx_CPUFREQ
This add the CPUFreq driver support for Intel PXA2xx SOCs.

If in doubt, say N.
+
+config ARM_QCOM_CPUFREQ_HW
+ bool "QCOM CPUFreq HW driver"
+ depends on ARCH_QCOM
+ help
+ Support for the CPUFreq HW driver.
+ Some QCOM chipsets have a HW engine to offload the steps
+ necessary for changing the frequency of the CPUs. Firmware loaded
+ in this engine exposes a programming interface to the OS.
+ The driver implements the cpufreq interface for this HW engine.
+ Say Y if you want to support CPUFreq HW.
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
index c1ffeab..ca48a1d 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_TEGRA124_CPUFREQ) += tegra124-cpufreq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_TEGRA186_CPUFREQ) += tegra186-cpufreq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_TI_CPUFREQ) += ti-cpufreq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_VEXPRESS_SPC_CPUFREQ) += vexpress-spc-cpufreq.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_QCOM_CPUFREQ_HW) += qcom-cpufreq-hw.o


##################################################################################
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ea8f7d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
@@ -0,0 +1,348 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
+
+#define INIT_RATE 300000000UL
+#define LUT_MAX_ENTRIES 40U
+#define CORE_COUNT_VAL(val) (((val) & (GENMASK(18, 16))) >> 16)
+#define LUT_ROW_SIZE 32
+
+enum {
+ REG_ENABLE,
+ REG_LUT_TABLE,
+ REG_PERF_STATE,
+
+ REG_ARRAY_SIZE,
+};
+
+struct cpufreq_qcom {
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table;
+ struct device *dev;

'dev' is not used and can be removed.


Thanks, would remove in the next patch.

...

+static int qcom_cpu_resources_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
+ struct device_node *np, unsigned int cpu,
+ unsigned long xo_rate)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_qcom *c;
+ struct resource res;
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ const u16 *offsets;
+ int ret, i, cpu_first, cpu_r;
+ void __iomem *base;
+
+ if (qcom_freq_domain_map[cpu])
+ return 0;
+
+ c = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*c), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!c)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ offsets = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
+ if (!offsets)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, &res);
+ if (!base)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (i = REG_ENABLE; i < REG_ARRAY_SIZE; i++)
+ c->reg_bases[i] = base + offsets[i];
+
+ /* HW should be in enabled state to proceed */
+ if (!(readl_relaxed(c->reg_bases[REG_ENABLE]) & 0x1)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "%s cpufreq hardware not enabled\n", np->name);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ ret = qcom_get_related_cpus(np, &c->related_cpus);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "%s failed to get related CPUs\n", np->name);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ c->max_cores = cpumask_weight(&c->related_cpus);
+ if (!c->max_cores)
+ return -ENOENT;
+
+ c->xo_rate = xo_rate;
+
+ ret = qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(pdev, c);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "%s failed to read LUT\n", np->name);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ qcom_freq_domain_map[cpu] = c;
+
+ /* Related CPUs */
+ cpu_first = cpumask_first(&c->related_cpus);
+
+ for_each_cpu(cpu_r, &c->related_cpus) {
+ if (cpu_r != cpu_first)
+ qcom_freq_domain_map[cpu_r] =
+ qcom_freq_domain_map[cpu_first];
+ }

The above ten lines could be simplified to:

for_each_cpu(cpu_r, &c->related_cpus)
qcom_freq_domain_map[cpu_r] = c;


Would clean it up in the next patch.

...

+static int __init qcom_cpufreq_hw_init(void)
+{
+ return platform_driver_register(&qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver);
+}
+subsys_initcall(qcom_cpufreq_hw_init);

Is subsys_initcall used for a particular reason? It will cause
problems when registering cooling devices, since the thermal device
class is initialized through an fs_initcall, which are executed
later.

Most cpufreq drivers use module_init, device_initcall or
late_initcall, can't this driver use one of those?


We want the CPU to be scaling to the highest frequency at the earliest.

Cheers

Matthias


--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.

--