Re: [PATCH v13 11/13] platform/x86: Intel SGX driver

From: Sean Christopherson
Date: Fri Sep 07 2018 - 13:03:04 EST


On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 05:50:01PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 19:35 +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > > Which one is right and why the kernel tree is polluted with C99-headers
> > > when they do not pass checkpatch.pl?
>
> checkpatch ignores c99 headers since 2016.

Jarkko was referring to c99 comments for the SPDX license. checkpatch
explicitly requires c-style comments for headers and assembly files as
dictated by Documentation/process/license-rules.rst.

$ grep -r SPDX **/*.h | grep \/\/ | wc -l
665

$ grep -r SPDX **/*.S | grep \/\/ | wc -l
22

$ git show 9f3a89926d6df
commit 9f3a89926d6dfc30a4fd1bbcb92cc7b218d3786d
Author: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Apr 10 16:33:13 2018 -0700

checkpatch.pl: add SPDX license tag check

Add SPDX license tag check based on the rules defined in
Documentation/process/license-rules.rst. To summarize, SPDX license
tags should be on the 1st line (or 2nd line in scripts) using the
appropriate comment style for the file type.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180202154026.15298-1-robh@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index b464a4c3f863..0f022b56f117 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -2257,6 +2257,8 @@ sub process {

my $camelcase_file_seeded = 0;

+ my $checklicenseline = 1;
+
sanitise_line_reset();
my $line;
foreach my $rawline (@rawlines) {
@@ -2448,6 +2450,7 @@ sub process {
} else {
$check = $check_orig;
}
+ $checklicenseline = 1;
next;
}

@@ -2911,6 +2914,30 @@ sub process {
}
}

+# check for using SPDX license tag at beginning of files
+ if ($realline == $checklicenseline) {
+ if ($rawline =~ /^[ \+]\s*\#\!\s*\//) {
+ $checklicenseline = 2;
+ } elsif ($rawline =~ /^\+/) {
+ my $comment = "";
+ if ($realfile =~ /\.(h|s|S)$/) {
+ $comment = '/*';
+ } elsif ($realfile =~ /\.(c|dts|dtsi)$/) {
+ $comment = '//';
+ } elsif (($checklicenseline == 2) || $realfile =~ /\.(sh|pl|py|awk|tc)$/) {
+ $comment = '#';
+ } elsif ($realfile =~ /\.rst$/) {
+ $comment = '..';
+ }
+
+ if ($comment !~ /^$/ &&
+ $rawline !~ /^\+\Q$comment\E SPDX-License-Identifier: /) {
+ WARN("SPDX_LICENSE_TAG",
+ "Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in line $checklicenseline\n" . $herecurr);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
# check we are in a valid source file if not then ignore this hunk
next if ($realfile !~ /\.(h|c|s|S|sh|dtsi|dts)$/);