[PATCH v2 net-next] bnxt_en: combine 'else if' and 'else' into single branch

From: YueHaibing
Date: Fri Aug 03 2018 - 05:30:11 EST


The else-if branch and else branch set mac_ok to true similarly,
so combine the two into single else branch.

Also add comments to explain the two conditions, which
from Michael Chan and Vasundhara Volam.

Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: fix typos: 'branche'--> 'branch' , 'Aslo'-->'Also'
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_sriov.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_sriov.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_sriov.c
index a649108..f560845 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_sriov.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_sriov.c
@@ -956,9 +956,13 @@ static int bnxt_vf_validate_set_mac(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_vf_info *vf)
} else if (is_valid_ether_addr(vf->vf_mac_addr)) {
if (ether_addr_equal((const u8 *)req->l2_addr, vf->vf_mac_addr))
mac_ok = true;
- } else if (bp->hwrm_spec_code < 0x10202) {
- mac_ok = true;
} else {
+ /* There are two cases:
+ * 1.If firmware spec < 0x10202,VF MAC address is not forwarded
+ * to the PF and so it doesn't have to match
+ * 2.Allow VF to modify it's own MAC when PF has not assigned a
+ * valid MAC address and firmware spec >= 0x10202
+ */
mac_ok = true;
}
if (mac_ok)
--
2.7.0