Re: [PATCH 08/12] ASoC: wcd9335: add basic controls

From: Srinivas Kandagatla
Date: Fri Jul 27 2018 - 05:55:17 EST


Thanks Vinod for review comments,

On 25/07/18 13:04, Vinod wrote:
On 23-07-18, 16:54, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:

+static int wcd9335_set_compander(struct snd_kcontrol *kc,
+ struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
+{
+ struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kc);
+ struct wcd9335_codec *wcd = dev_get_drvdata(component->dev);
+ int comp = ((struct soc_mixer_control *) kc->private_value)->shift;
+ int value = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];
+ int sel;
+
+ wcd->comp_enabled[comp] = value;
+ sel = value ? WCD9335_HPH_GAIN_SRC_SEL_COMPANDER :
+ WCD9335_HPH_GAIN_SRC_SEL_REGISTER;
+
+ /* Any specific register configuration for compander */
+ switch (comp) {
+ case COMPANDER_1:
+ /* Set Gain Source Select based on compander enable/disable */
+ snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, WCD9335_HPH_L_EN,
+ WCD9335_HPH_GAIN_SRC_SEL_MASK, sel);
+ break;
+ case COMPANDER_2:
+ snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, WCD9335_HPH_R_EN,
+ WCD9335_HPH_GAIN_SRC_SEL_MASK, sel);
+ break;
+ case COMPANDER_3:
+ break;
+ case COMPANDER_4:
+ break;
+ case COMPANDER_5:
+ snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, WCD9335_SE_LO_LO3_GAIN,
+ WCD9335_HPH_GAIN_SRC_SEL_MASK, sel);
+ break;
+ case COMPANDER_6:
+ snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, WCD9335_SE_LO_LO4_GAIN,
+ WCD9335_HPH_GAIN_SRC_SEL_MASK, sel);
+ break;
+ case COMPANDER_7:
+ break;
+ case COMPANDER_8:
+ break;

why not do:

case COMPANDER_3:
case COMPANDER_4:
case COMPANDER_7:
case COMPANDER_8:
break;

thereby clubbing all the ones not handled together..

I removed the un-handled ones in v2.

+static int wcd9335_rx_hph_mode_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kc,
+ struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
+{
+ struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kc);
+ struct wcd9335_codec *wcd = dev_get_drvdata(component->dev);
+
+ ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = wcd->hph_mode;

i think this is an enum so shouldn't value.enumerated.item[0] be used?

Yep, there are one more instances like this, i fixed this in v2.
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int wcd9335_rx_hph_mode_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kc,
+ struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
+{
+ struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kc);
+ struct wcd9335_codec *wcd = dev_get_drvdata(component->dev);
+ u32 mode_val;
+
+ mode_val = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0];

yaaay

--srini