Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] 9p: Replace the fidlist with an IDR

[Dominique Martinet]

Matthew Wilcox wrote on Thu, Jul 12, 2018:
> > Ah, I had missed that you didn't update this memset as you said in reply
> > to comment on v1.
> 
> Rather than update the memset, I ... 
> 
> > Could you resend just this patch and either initialize fid->fid or use
> > kzalloc for the fid allocation?
> > 
> > > +	fid->fid = 0;
> 
> Did that instead ;-)
> 
> If I were going to initialise the entire structure to 0, I'd replace
> the kmalloc with kzalloc and drop the memset altogether.

Oh, I'm blind, sorry! :)

> > If you do resend, alignment here was wrong.
> 
> I think this warning from checkpatch is complete bullshit.  It's
> really none of checkpatch's business how I choose to align function
> arguments.
> 
> That said, if you want it to be aligned some particular way, feel free
> to adjust the whitespace.  I don't care.

I would tend to agree that sometimes checkpatch is overzealous, but
having worked on projects where code style is all over the place it
really feels much more comfortable to have a consistent style
everywhere.

Thanks for the permission, I'll adjust it (assuming this does end up
getting pulled from my branch, but nobody yelled so far)

-- 
Dominique Martinet