Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] dt: thermal: tsens: Document the fallback DT property for v2 of TSENS IP

From: Amit Kucheria
Date: Thu Jul 12 2018 - 01:56:43 EST


On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:12 AM Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > We want to create common code for v2 of the TSENS IP block that is used in
> > a large number of Qualcomm SoCs. "qcom,tsens-v2" should be able to handle
> > most of the common functionality start with a common get_temp() function.
> >
> > It is also necessary to split out the memory regions for the TM and SROT
> > register banks because their offsets are not constant across SoC families.
>
> nit that bindings should be earlier in the patch series than the code
> implementing the bindings.

Will reorder.

>
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.txt | 25 +++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.txt
> > index 06195e8..8f963b1 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.txt
> > @@ -1,10 +1,16 @@
> > * QCOM SoC Temperature Sensor (TSENS)
> >
> > Required properties:
> > -- compatible :
> > - - "qcom,msm8916-tsens" : For 8916 Family of SoCs
> > - - "qcom,msm8974-tsens" : For 8974 Family of SoCs
> > - - "qcom,msm8996-tsens" : For 8996 Family of SoCs
> > +- compatible:
> > + Must be one of the following:
> > + - "qcom,msm8916-tsens" (MSM8916)
> > + - "qcom,msm8974-tsens" (MSM8974)
> > + - "qcom,msm8996-tsens" (MSM8996)
> > + - "qcom,msm8998-tsens", "qcom,tsens-v2" (MSM8998)
> > + - "qcom,sdm845-tsens", "qcom,tsens-v2" (SDM845)
> > + The generic "qcom,tsens-v2" property must be used as a fallback for any SoC with
> > + version 2 of the TSENS IP. MSM8996 is the only exception beacause the generic
> > + property did not exist when support was added.
> >
> > - reg: Address range of the thermal registers
>
> You need to document that for old SoCs where TM / SROT were 0x1000
> apart (SROT first) that one "reg" field was OK. ...and that for new
> SoCs you specify two reg ranges: the first for TM and the second for
> SROT.

OK.

> > - #thermal-sensor-cells : Should be 1. See ./thermal.txt for a description.
> > @@ -12,7 +18,7 @@ Required properties:
> > - Refer to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/nvmem.txt to know how to specify
> > nvmem cells
> >
> > -Example:
> > +Example 1 (legacy support before a fallback tsens-v2 propoerty was introduced):
> > tsens: thermal-sensor@900000 {
> > compatible = "qcom,msm8916-tsens";
> > reg = <0x4a8000 0x2000>;
> > @@ -20,3 +26,12 @@ tsens: thermal-sensor@900000 {
> > nvmem-cell-names = "caldata", "calsel";
> > #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
> > };
> > +
> > +Example 2 (for any platform containing v2 of the TSENS IP):
> > +tsens0: tsens@c222000 {
>
> A) Use a generic name for the node, not a specific one. Thus the node
> should be "thermal-sensor", not "tsens".
>
> B) This unit address needs to match the _first_ reg address listed.
> Give your reg below, this should be @c263000
>
> Thus your node name should be:
>
> tsens0: thermal-sensor@c263000 {

Fixed

> > + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-tsens", "qcom,tsens-v2";
> > + reg = <0xc263000 0x1ff>, /* TM */
> > + <0xc222000 0x1ff>; /* SROT */
> > + #qcom,sensors = <13>;
>
> The "#qcom,sensors" property seems wrong in a few ways:
>
> A) I wouldn't have expected it to start with a "#". I only expect to
> see that on things specifying sizes / lengths. Rob can feel free to
> override me, though.
>
> B) It's not documented above. Just putting something in an example
> doesn't document it--it needs to be listed in the "Optional
> properties".