Re: [PATCH] tracing/kprobe: Release kprobe print_fmt properly

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Wed Jul 11 2018 - 08:54:34 EST



Masami,

Can you ack this? If I don't hear from you by tomorrow, I'm going to
push it to Linus, because I'll be on PTO after that.

Thanks!

-- Steve


On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 09:04:17 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 16:19:06 +0200
> Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > We don't release tk->tp.call.print_fmt when destroying
> > local uprobe. Also there's missing print_fmt kfree in
> > create_local_trace_kprobe error path.
>
> OK, I finished testing and I'm all ready to push, but then I noticed
> that Masami wasn't Cc'd. I like to get his ack before pushing to Linus.
>
> -- Steve
>
>
> >
> > Fixes: e12f03d7031a ("perf/core: Implement the 'perf_kprobe' PMU")
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 6 +++++-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> > index daa81571b22a..21f718472942 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> > @@ -1480,8 +1480,10 @@ create_local_trace_kprobe(char *func, void *addr, unsigned long offs,
> > }
> >
> > ret = __register_trace_kprobe(tk);
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + kfree(tk->tp.call.print_fmt);
> > goto error;
> > + }
> >
> > return &tk->tp.call;
> > error:
> > @@ -1501,6 +1503,8 @@ void destroy_local_trace_kprobe(struct trace_event_call *event_call)
> > }
> >
> > __unregister_trace_kprobe(tk);
> > +
> > + kfree(tk->tp.call.print_fmt);
> > free_trace_kprobe(tk);
> > }
> > #endif /* CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS */
>