Re: [PATCH v11 5/8] i2c: fsi: Add transfer implementation

[Eddie James]

On 07/09/2018 05:41 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > +	cmd |= FIELD_PREP(I2C_CMD_ADDR, msg->addr >> 1);
> I just noticed this and wonder: Don't you need the LSB of the address?
> It is not the RW flag, this is encoded in msg->flags.

So, the hardware interprets the LSB as the RW flag. It wouldn't be 
possible to have a device addressed with the LSB set on this I2C master.

> Also, no seperate handling for 10 bit addresses? Technically, 7-bit 0x50
> is different on the wire from 10-bit 0x050. This is minor, though. There
> are no 10-bit devices out there. Still, did you test 10-bit support?

Indeed, real 10-bit addresses require some additional manipulation of 
this I2C master in order to work. We don't support it right now.

Thanks,
Eddie

> Rest looks good.