Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Reintroduce i.MX EPIT Timer

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 10/07/2018 17:22, ClÃment PÃron wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 at 17:12, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/07/2018 16:55, ClÃment PÃron wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is there still some remark against merging this ?
>>
>> How do you want this to be merged ?
>>
>> Shall I take the two patches related to the timer ? Or Ack them ?
> 
> I'm not an expert on how submitting patches works, it's the first
> driver I submit.

Ok, so usually this is what happens when there is a set of changes:

 1.  they all touch the same subsystem (eg. drivers/clocksource), you
just send all the patches to the maintainer(s) + mailing list + related
people

 2. they touch different subsystems:

   2.1) the changes are not connected (not related together), you have
to split in smaller parts and send the patches to the right subsystem
maintainer (so falling back to 1.)

   2.2) the changes are connected:

      2.2.1) Ask all the different subsystem maintainers to acknowledge
the changes and submit the patches to arm-soc@

      2.2.2) Ask each maintainer to take their part if the changes are
connected but not interdependent (patches individually won't break the
system)


You are in the 2.2) situation. My question is do you want 2.2.1) or 2.2.2) ?


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog