Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] arm64: dts: sdm845: Add tsens nodes

From: Matthias Kaehlcke
Date: Mon Jul 09 2018 - 12:10:29 EST


On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 09:34:55PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:31 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 04:56:51PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 3:18 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 06:14:09PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> >> >> SDM845 has two tsens blocks, one with 13 sensors and the other with 8
> >> >> sensors.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >> >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> >> >> index cdaabeb..edf8505 100644
> >> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> >> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> >> >> @@ -221,6 +221,22 @@
> >> >> #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> >> >> };
> >> >>
> >> >> + tsens0: tsens@c222000 {
> >> >> + compatible = "qcom,tsens-v2.4.0", "qcom,tsens-v2";
> >> >> + reg = <0xc263000 0x1ff>, /* TM */
> >> >> + <0xc222000 0x1ff>; /* SROT */
> >> >> + #qcom,sensors = <13>;
> >> >> + #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
> >> >> + };
> >> >> +
> >> >> + tsens1: tsens@c223000 {
> >> >> + compatible = "qcom,tsens-v2.4.0", "qcom,tsens-v2";
> >> >> + reg = <0xc265000 0x1ff>, /* TM */
> >> >> + <0xc223000 0x1ff>; /* SROT */
> >> >> + #qcom,sensors = <8>;
> >> >> + #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
> >> >> + };
> >> >> +
> >> >> spmi_bus: spmi@c440000 {
> >> >> compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb";
> >> >> reg = <0xc440000 0x1100>,
> >> >
> >> > I tested this series on an SDM845 board. Temperatures can be read from
> >> > the tsens0 sensors, however for tsens1 sensors I get:
> >> >
> >> > cat temp
> >> > cat: temp: No data available
> >> >
> >> > TRDY_READY_BIT set when reading TRDY_OFFSET in get_temp_tsens_v2().
> >> > Unfortunately I currently have no documentation of the registers or the
> >> > thermal sensors in general and couldn't investigate further.
> >> >
> >> > Any idea what could be the problem?
> >>
> >> Strangely enough, I'm seeing this now after rebuilding my integration
> >> branch to test some other bits.
> >>
> >> I've sent another version with this patch removed while I investigate
> >> this. Could you check if you're able to read all 8 sensors with v5?
> >
> > With v6 all sensors can be read, thanks!
>
> Great! Would it be OK to add your Tested-by tag?

Yep