Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86,tlb: make lazy TLB mode lazier

[Rik van Riel]

On Wed, 2018-06-27 at 11:10 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:31 AM Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:

> In general, the changes to this function are very hard to review
> because you're mixing semantic changes and restructuring the
> function.
> Is there any way you could avoid that?  Or maybe just open-code a
> tlb_gen check in the unlazying path?

Let me re-do v2 of the patch series in a way that
splits out the restructuring from the semantic
changes.

I already have code here that open-codes the tlb_gen
check in the unlazying path (not in v2 yet).

-- 
All Rights Reversed.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part