Re: [PATCH] mm: mempool: Fix a possible sleep-in-atomic-context bug in mempool_resize()

From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Wed Jun 20 2018 - 23:38:49 EST


On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:07:14AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> The kernel may sleep with holding a spinlock.
> The function call path (from bottom to top) in Linux-4.16.7 is:
>
> [FUNC] remove_element(GFP_KERNEL)
> mm/mempool.c, 250: remove_element in mempool_resize
> mm/mempool.c, 247: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave in mempool_resize
>
> To fix this bug, GFP_KERNEL is replaced with GFP_ATOMIC.
>
> This bug is found by my static analysis tool (DSAC-2) and checked by
> my code review.

But ... we don't use the flags argument.

static void *remove_element(mempool_t *pool, gfp_t flags)
{
void *element = pool->elements[--pool->curr_nr];

BUG_ON(pool->curr_nr < 0);
kasan_unpoison_element(pool, element, flags);
check_element(pool, element);
return element;
}

...

static void kasan_unpoison_element(mempool_t *pool, void *element, gfp_t flags)
{
if (pool->alloc == mempool_alloc_slab || pool->alloc == mempool_kmalloc)
kasan_unpoison_slab(element);
if (pool->alloc == mempool_alloc_pages)
kasan_alloc_pages(element, (unsigned long)pool->pool_data);
}

So the correct patch would just remove this argument to remove_element() and
kasan_unpoison_element()?