Re: [PATCHv3 00/18] atomics: API cleanups

From: Will Deacon
Date: Tue Jun 19 2018 - 06:20:19 EST


On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:18:01AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 08:21:27PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 05:38:06PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:19:01AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > This series contains a few cleanups of the atomic API, fixing
> > > > inconsistencies between atomic_* and atomic64_*, and minimizing
> > > > repetition in arch code. This is nicer for arch code, and the improved
> > > > regularity will help when generating the atomic headers in future.
> > >
> > > Apart from the Alpha patch:
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > Cheers! I assume that also holds with patch 7 fixes up to use s64.
>
> I've pushed out the series with those fixes and your Reviewed-by tags.
>
> Given the whole series has your Reviewed-By and Peter's Acked-by, I
> assume that you're both happy for this to be queued?
>
> What's your prefered way for that to happen? Should I send a v4 with
> those fixes, a pull request, or are you happy to fetch that in a little
> while regardless?

Probably best to send a v4, then Ingo can take it all via -tip. Before you
do that, can you also spell-check your commit messages please? I spotted a
bunch of silly typos, and it will save Ingo from having to fix them up if
you do it first.

Will