Re: [PATCH] staging: board: drop refcount in success case

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Tue Jun 19 2018 - 03:52:02 EST


On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 9:37 AM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 08:53:19PM +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> > The call to of_find_compatible_node() returns irqc_node with refcount
> > incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented here after it was
> > checked for non-NULL.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Fixes: commit 72ee8626eeb1 ("staging: board: Add support for translating hwirq to virq numbers")
> > ---
> >
> > Problem located with an experimental coccinelle script
> >
> > Patch was compile-tested with: x86_64_defconfig + STAGING=y, STAGING_BOARD=y
> >
> > Patch is against 4.18-rc1 (localversion-next is next-20180618)
> >
> > drivers/staging/board/board.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/board/board.c b/drivers/staging/board/board.c
> > index cb6feb3..8ee48e5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/board/board.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/board/board.c
> > @@ -64,12 +64,13 @@ int __init board_staging_gic_setup_xlate(const char *gic_match,
> > irqc_node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, gic_match);
> >
> > WARN_ON(!irqc_node);
> > if (!irqc_node)
> > return -ENOENT;
> >
> > + of_node_put(irqc_node);
>
> I don't feel like this is the right thing... We should keep the
> reference until we're done with it. Which apparently is never?

Indeed. The reference must not be released in this function, as it's stored in
a global variable, and used later.

As all users are __init, it could be released when the init section is freeed,
in theory, but there's no callback for that.

Hence:
NAKed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds