Re: [PATCH 01/10] x86/cet: User-mode shadow stack support

[Dave Hansen]

On 06/07/2018 10:46 AM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
>> Also, did you add all the needed checks to make get_user_pages(),
>> access_process_vm(), etc fail when called on the shadow stack?  (Or at
>> least fail if they're requesting write access and the FORCE bit isn't
>> set.)
> Currently if FORCE bit is set, these functions can write to shadow
> stack, otherwise write access will fail.  I will test it.

Is this a part of your selftests/ for this feature?