Re: [PATCH] clang-format: Set IndentWrappedFunctionNames false

[Joe Perches]

On Wed, 2018-06-06 at 14:15 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> The true option causes this indenting for functions:
> 
> static struct something_very_very_long *
>     function(void *arg)
> {
> 
> While a quick survey suggests that the usual Linux fallback is the GNU
> style:
> 
> static struct something_very_very_long *
> function(void *arg)
> 
[]
> AFAIK the above describes the more common choice in the code base?
> 
> Not sure who's tree this is supposed to go through.. Andrew I guess?

I believe so yes.

I expect there will be more refinements to .clang-formata
as perhaps more people experiment with it too.

Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>

> diff --git a/.clang-format b/.clang-format
> index faffc0d5af4eeb..1d5da22e0ba50c 100644
> --- a/.clang-format
> +++ b/.clang-format
> @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ IncludeIsMainRegex: '(Test)?$'
>  IndentCaseLabels: false
>  #IndentPPDirectives: None # Unknown to clang-format-5.0
>  IndentWidth: 8
> -IndentWrappedFunctionNames: true
> +IndentWrappedFunctionNames: false
>  JavaScriptQuotes: Leave
>  JavaScriptWrapImports: true
>  KeepEmptyLinesAtTheStartOfBlocks: false