Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] Refactor part of the oom report in dump_header

[çèé]

Hi Tetsuo
> Since origin_memcg_name is printed for both memcg OOM and !memcg OOM, it is strange that origin_memcg_name is updated only when memcg != NULL. Have you really tested !memcg OOM case?

if memcg == NULL , origin_memcg_name will also be NULL, so the length
of it is 0. origin_memcg_name will be "(null)". I've tested !memcg OOM
case with CONFIG_MEMCG and !CONFIG_MEMCG, and found nothing wrong.

Thanks
Wind
çèé <ufo19890607@xxxxxxxxx> ä2018å6æ4æåä äå9:58åéï
>
> Hi Mike
> > Please keep the brief description of the function actually brief and move the detailed explanation after the parameters description.
> Thanks for your advice.
>
> > The allocation constraint is detected by the dump_header() callers, why not just use it here?
> David suggest that constraint need to be printed in the oom report, so
> I add the enum variable in this function.
>
> Thanks
> Wind