Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] dt-bindings: gnss: add u-blox binding
From: Johan Hovold
Date: Fri Jun 01 2018 - 04:16:05 EST
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:58:59AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 08:55:10AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 3:22 AM, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:58:05PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 12:32:38PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >> >> > Add binding for u-blox GNSS receivers.
> >> >> > +Optional properties:
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +- timepulse-gpios : Time pulse GPIO
> >> >> > +- u-blox,extint-gpios : External interrupt GPIO
> >> >>
> >> >> This should be interrupts property instead of a gpio.
> >> >
> >> > Contrary to what the name may suggest, this pin is actually an input
> >> > which can be used to control active power or to provide time or
> >> > frequency aiding data to the receiver (see section 1.13 in [1]).
> >> >
> >> > I only added it for completeness as the driver does not use it
> >> > currently. Remove, leave as is, or add "input" to the description as in:
> >> >
> >> > - u-blox,extint-gpios : External interrupt input GPIO
> >>
> >> Yes. You should also define the active level.
> >
> > The active level appears to be runtime configurable and dependent on the
> > selected function. For power control it can be used to control force-on
> > (active high), force-off (active low) or both; and for time aiding
> > sampling on falling or rising edge is also configurable. And who knows
> > what else this pin is used for next time they update the firmware. ;)
>
> Okay.
>
> > Shall I remove the property, or just add "input" as suggested above?
>
> Just add "input".
I ended up rewording this as
u-blox,extint-gpios : GPIO connected to the "external
interrupt" input pin
to avoid any confusion about the direction of the GPIO.
Thanks,
Johan