Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] mfd: bd71837: Devicetree bindings for ROHM BD71837 PMIC

From: Rob Herring
Date: Wed May 30 2018 - 23:01:38 EST


On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:42:03AM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> Document devicetree bindings for ROHM BD71837 PMIC MFD.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71837-pmic.txt | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71837-pmic.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71837-pmic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71837-pmic.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..bbc46d38b162
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71837-pmic.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +* ROHM BD71837 Power Management Integrated Circuit bindings
> +
> +BD71837MWV is a programmable Power Management IC for powering single-core,
> +dual-core, and quad-core SoCâs such as NXP-i.MX 8M. It is optimized for
> +low BOM cost and compact solution footprint. It integrates 8 Buck
> +egulators and 7 LDOâs to provide all the power rails required by the SoC and
> +the commonly used peripherals.
> +
> +Required properties:
> + - compatible : Should be "rohm,bd71837".
> + - reg : I2C slave address.
> + - interrupt-parent : Phandle to the parent interrupt controller.
> + - interrupts : The interrupt line the device is connected to.
> + - interrupt-controller : Marks the device node as an interrupt controller.

What sub blocks have interrupts?

> + - #interrupt-cells : The number of cells to describe an IRQ, should be 1 or 2.
> + The first cell is the IRQ number.
> + The second cell if present is the flags, encoded as trigger
> + masks from ../interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt.
> + - regulators: : List of child nodes that specify the regulators
> + Please see ../regulator/rohm,bd71837-regulator.txt
> + - clock: : Please see ../clock/rohm,bd71837-clock.txt
> +
> +Example:
> +
> + pmic: bd71837@4b {

Node names should be generic ideally. So "pmic@4b"

> + compatible = "rohm,bd71837";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + reg = <0x4b>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio1>;
> + interrupts = <29 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + interrupt-names = "irq";
> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> +
> + regulators {
> + buck1: BUCK1 {
> + regulator-name = "buck1";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <700000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1300000>;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + regulator-ramp-delay = <1250>;
> + };
> + ...
> + };
> + clk: bd71837-32k-out {

clock-controller {

> + compatible = "rohm,bd71837-clk";
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + clock-frequency = <32768>;

Can this be anything else?

> + clock-output-names = "bd71837-32k-out";
> + };
> + };
> --
> 2.14.3
>