[PATCH 4.14 404/496] IB/core: Honor port_num while resolving GID for IB link layer

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Mon May 28 2018 - 06:59:53 EST


4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 563c4ba3bd2b8b0b21c65669ec2226b1cfa1138b ]

ah_attr contains the port number to which cm_id is bound. However, while
searching for GID table for matching GID entry, the port number is
ignored.

This could cause the wrong GID to be used when the ah_attr is converted to
an AH.

Reviewed-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/infiniband/core/multicast.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/multicast.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/multicast.c
@@ -724,21 +724,19 @@ int ib_init_ah_from_mcmember(struct ib_d
{
int ret;
u16 gid_index;
- u8 p;

- if (rdma_protocol_roce(device, port_num)) {
- ret = ib_find_cached_gid_by_port(device, &rec->port_gid,
- gid_type, port_num,
- ndev,
- &gid_index);
- } else if (rdma_protocol_ib(device, port_num)) {
- ret = ib_find_cached_gid(device, &rec->port_gid,
- IB_GID_TYPE_IB, NULL, &p,
- &gid_index);
- } else {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- }
+ /* GID table is not based on the netdevice for IB link layer,
+ * so ignore ndev during search.
+ */
+ if (rdma_protocol_ib(device, port_num))
+ ndev = NULL;
+ else if (!rdma_protocol_roce(device, port_num))
+ return -EINVAL;

+ ret = ib_find_cached_gid_by_port(device, &rec->port_gid,
+ gid_type, port_num,
+ ndev,
+ &gid_index);
if (ret)
return ret;