Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a7795: add ccree binding

From: Gilad Ben-Yossef
Date: Thu May 24 2018 - 08:27:56 EST


On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Gilad,
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 3:43 PM, Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 1:16 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Indeed. From a quick glance, it looks like drivers/crypto/ccree/cc_driver.c
>>> does not distinguish between the absence of the clock property, and an
>>> actual error in getting the clock, and never considers any error a failure
>>> (incl. -PROBE_DEFER).
>>>
>>> As of_clk_get() returns -ENOENT for both a missing clock property and a
>>> missing clock, you should use (devm_)clk_get() instead, and distinguish
>>> between NULL (no clock property) and IS_ERR() (actual failure -> abort).
>>
>> I was trying to do as you suggested but I didn't quite get what is the
>> dev_id (2nd) parameter to devm_clk_get parameter is supposed to be.
>
> It's the (optional) name of the clock, helpful in case there is more than one.
> In your case, NULL is fine.
>

I have assumed as much and tried it, it did not work and so I assumed
I am missing something and asked you.
It turns out I was missing the fact I was using the wrong device tree
file... :-(

So thanks, it works now :-)

Having said that, while using devm)clk_get() is a better approach, it
does not seems to distinguish
between no "clocks" and a failure to clock information - it returns
ENOENT in both cases as well.

Thanks,
Gilad


--
Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker

"If you take a class in large-scale robotics, can you end up in a
situation where the homework eats your dog?"
-- Jean-Baptiste Queru