Re: [PATCH RFCv2 1/4] ACPI: NUMA: export pxm_to_node

[David Hildenbrand]

On 24.05.2018 10:47, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:33 AM, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 24.05.2018 10:12, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 8:24 PM, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Will be needed by paravirtualized memory devices.
>>>
>>> That's a little information.
>>>
>>> It would be good to see the entire series at least.
>>
>> It's part of this series (guess you only received the cover letter and
>> this patch). Here a link to the patch using it:
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/23/803
> 
> OK, thanks!
> 
> It looks like you have a reason to use it in there, but please note
> that CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA depends on CONFIG_NUMA, so you don't need to use
> the latter directly in the #ifdef.  Also wouldn't IS_ENABLED() work
> there?

Thanks for the tip on CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA. Wouldn't IS_ENABLED() require to
have a dummy implementation of pxm_to_node() in case drivers/acpi/numa.c
is not compiled?

> 
> Moreover, you don't need the local node variable in
> virtio_mem_translate_node_id().
> 

Indeed, thanks!

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb