Re: [PATCH] x86: UV: raw_spinlock conversion

[Mike Galbraith]

On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 11:46 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 11:14 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> 
> >  If you suggest that I
> > should stop caring about UV than I do so. Please post a patch that adds
> > a dependency to UV on PREEMPT so that part of the architecture is
> > documented.
> 
> Will do.

On second thought, no I won't.  It's either already known, or it should
be, making any such submission smell funny.

	-Mike