Re: [PATCH 2/2] bpf: btf: remove a couple conditions

From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Fri Apr 27 2018 - 15:40:40 EST


On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55:46AM -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:20:25AM -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 05:04:59PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > We know "err" is zero so we can remove these and pull the code in one
> > > indent level.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Thanks for the simplification!
> >
> > Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>
> btw, it should be for bpf-next. Please tag the subject with bpf-next when
> you respin. Thanks!
>

I'm working against linux-next. For networking, I have a separate tree
which I use to figure out if it's in net or net-next. It's kind of a
headache (but obviously networking is the largest subtree so it's
required).

Is there an automated way to tie a Fixes tag from linux-next to a
subtree?

regards,
dan carpenter