Re: [PATCH] lockdep: Do not record irq state in debug_check_no_locks_freed()

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 12:19:04PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> While debugging where things were going wrong with mapping
> enabling/disabling interrupts with the lockdep state and actual real
> enabling and disabling interrupts, I had to silent the irq
> disabling/enabling in debug_check_no_locks_freed() because it was
> always showing up as it was called before the splat was.
> 
> Use raw_local_irq_save/restore() for debug_check_no_locks_freed() as it
> hides useful information about where interrupts were used incorrectly
> last.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> index 89b5f83f1969..8c145dc1315b 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> @@ -4407,7 +4407,7 @@ void debug_check_no_locks_freed(const void *mem_from, unsigned long mem_len)
>  	if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
>  		return;
>  
> -	local_irq_save(flags);
> +	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
>  	for (i = 0; i < curr->lockdep_depth; i++) {
>  		hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
>  
> @@ -4418,7 +4418,7 @@ void debug_check_no_locks_freed(const void *mem_from, unsigned long mem_len)
>  		print_freed_lock_bug(curr, mem_from, mem_from + mem_len, hlock);
>  		break;
>  	}
> -	local_irq_restore(flags);
> +	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debug_check_no_locks_freed);

Makes sense, could you convert all of them just to make sure there
aren't any left?