Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Initial Allwinner H6 support

[Maxime Ripard]

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 09:28:23AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 
> 
> ä 2018å3æ19æ GMT+08:00 äå4:17:44, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx> åå:
> >On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 10:02:06PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> >> This patchset adds initial support for the Allwinner H6 SoC.
> >> 
> >> It's quite different from earlier Allwinner SoCs. For example, the
> >> memory map is refactored, and the CCU is rearranged. It's also the
> >first
> >> Allwinner SoC with PCI Express interface (although the implementation
> >> of the PCI Express controller is broken), and the second one with USB
> >> 3.0 (the first one is A80).
> >> 
> >> This patchset adds the most basical support for it, including the
> >main pin
> >> controller, the main CCU and the basical device tree.
> >> 
> >> Icenowy Zheng (9):
> >>   pinctrl: sunxi: refactor irq related register function to have desc
> >>   pinctrl: sunxi: introduce IRQ bank conversion function
> >>   pinctrl: sunxi: change irq_bank_base to irq_bank_map
> >>   pinctrl: sunxi: add support for the Allwinner H6 main pin
> >controller
> >>   clk: sunxi-ng: Support fixed post-dividers on NKMP style clocks
> >>   dt-bindings: add device tree binding for Allwinner H6 main CCU
> >>   clk: sunxi-ng: add support for the Allwinner H6 CCU
> >>   arm64: allwinner: h6: add the basical Allwinner H6 DTSI file
> >>   arm64: allwinner: h6: add support for Pine H64 board
> >
> >Applied the !pinctrl patches.
> 
> Oops, one clock (CLK_HDMI_SLOW) is missing in the CCU
> driver, as Jernej pointed out.
> 
> Should I send a patch that fix it?

Yes, please.

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com