Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] irqchip/gic-v3-its: add ability to resend MAPC on resume

[Marc Zyngier]

On 03/02/18 01:24, Derek Basehore wrote:
> This adds functionality to resend the MAPC command to an ITS node on
> resume. If the ITS is powered down during suspend and the collections
> are not backed by memory, the ITS will lose that state. This just sets
> up the known state for the collections after the ITS is restored.
> 
> This feature is enabled via Kconfig and a device tree entry.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Derek Basehore <dbasehore@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig               |  10 ++++
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 53612879fe56..f38f1a7b4266 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -571,6 +571,16 @@ config HISILICON_ERRATUM_161600802
>  
>  	  If unsure, say Y.
>  
> +config ARM_GIC500_COLLECTIONS_RESET
> +	bool "GIC-500 Collections: Workaround for GIC-500 Collections on suspend reset"
> +	default y
> +	help
> +	  The GIC-500 can store Collections state internally for the ITS. If
> +	  the ITS is reset on suspend (ie from power getting disabled), the
> +	  collections need to be reconfigured on resume.
> +
> +	  If unsure, say Y.
> +
>  config QCOM_FALKOR_ERRATUM_E1041
>  	bool "Falkor E1041: Speculative instruction fetches might cause errant memory access"
>  	default y
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> index e13515cdb68f..63764efa4dcc 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
>  #define ITS_FLAGS_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_22375	(1ULL << 1)
>  #define ITS_FLAGS_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_23144	(1ULL << 2)
>  #define ITS_FLAGS_SAVE_SUSPEND_STATE		(1ULL << 3)
> +#define ITS_FLAGS_WORKAROUND_GIC500_MAPC	(1ULL << 4)
>  
>  #define RDIST_FLAGS_PROPBASE_NEEDS_FLUSHING	(1 << 0)
>  
> @@ -1950,52 +1951,53 @@ static void its_cpu_init_lpis(void)
>  	dsb(sy);
>  }
>  
> -static void its_cpu_init_collection(void)
> +static void its_cpu_init_collection(struct its_node *its)
>  {
> -	struct its_node *its;
> -	int cpu;
> -
> -	spin_lock(&its_lock);
> -	cpu = smp_processor_id();
> -
> -	list_for_each_entry(its, &its_nodes, entry) {
> -		u64 target;
> +	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +	u64 target;
>  
> -		/* avoid cross node collections and its mapping */
> -		if (its->flags & ITS_FLAGS_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_23144) {
> -			struct device_node *cpu_node;
> +	/* avoid cross node collections and its mapping */
> +	if (its->flags & ITS_FLAGS_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_23144) {
> +		struct device_node *cpu_node;
>  
> -			cpu_node = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
> -			if (its->numa_node != NUMA_NO_NODE &&
> -				its->numa_node != of_node_to_nid(cpu_node))
> -				continue;
> -		}
> +		cpu_node = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
> +		if (its->numa_node != NUMA_NO_NODE &&
> +			its->numa_node != of_node_to_nid(cpu_node))
> +			return;
> +	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * We now have to bind each collection to its target
> +	 * redistributor.
> +	 */
> +	if (gic_read_typer(its->base + GITS_TYPER) & GITS_TYPER_PTA) {
>  		/*
> -		 * We now have to bind each collection to its target
> +		 * This ITS wants the physical address of the
>  		 * redistributor.
>  		 */
> -		if (gic_read_typer(its->base + GITS_TYPER) & GITS_TYPER_PTA) {
> -			/*
> -			 * This ITS wants the physical address of the
> -			 * redistributor.
> -			 */
> -			target = gic_data_rdist()->phys_base;
> -		} else {
> -			/*
> -			 * This ITS wants a linear CPU number.
> -			 */
> -			target = gic_read_typer(gic_data_rdist_rd_base() + GICR_TYPER);
> -			target = GICR_TYPER_CPU_NUMBER(target) << 16;
> -		}
> +		target = gic_data_rdist()->phys_base;
> +	} else {
> +		/* This ITS wants a linear CPU number. */
> +		target = gic_read_typer(gic_data_rdist_rd_base() + GICR_TYPER);
> +		target = GICR_TYPER_CPU_NUMBER(target) << 16;
> +	}
>  
> -		/* Perform collection mapping */
> -		its->collections[cpu].target_address = target;
> -		its->collections[cpu].col_id = cpu;
> +	/* Perform collection mapping */
> +	its->collections[cpu].target_address = target;
> +	its->collections[cpu].col_id = cpu;
>  
> -		its_send_mapc(its, &its->collections[cpu], 1);
> -		its_send_invall(its, &its->collections[cpu]);
> -	}
> +	its_send_mapc(its, &its->collections[cpu], 1);
> +	its_send_invall(its, &its->collections[cpu]);
> +}
> +
> +static void its_cpu_init_collections(void)
> +{
> +	struct its_node *its;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&its_lock);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(its, &its_nodes, entry)
> +		its_cpu_init_collection(its);
>  
>  	spin_unlock(&its_lock);
>  }
> @@ -2997,6 +2999,18 @@ static bool __maybe_unused its_enable_quirk_hip07_161600802(void *data)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> +static bool __maybe_unused its_enable_quirk_gic500_collections(void *data)
> +{
> +	struct its_node *its = data;
> +
> +	if (fwnode_property_present(its->fwnode_handle,
> +				    "collections-reset-on-suspend")) {
> +		its->flags |= ITS_FLAGS_WORKAROUND_GIC500_MAPC;
> +		return true;
> +	}
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct gic_quirk its_quirks[] = {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CAVIUM_ERRATUM_22375
>  	{
> @@ -3042,6 +3056,14 @@ static const struct gic_quirk its_quirks[] = {
>  		.mask	= 0xffffffff,
>  		.init	= its_enable_quirk_hip07_161600802,
>  	},
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_GIC500_COLLECTIONS_RESET
> +	{
> +		.desc	= "ITS: GIC-500 Collections Reset on Resume",
> +		.iidr	= 0x00000000,
> +		.mask	= 0xff000000,
> +		.init	= its_enable_quirk_gic500_collections,
> +	},
>  #endif
>  	{
>  	}
> @@ -3129,6 +3151,9 @@ static void its_restore_enable(void)
>  			}
>  			writel_relaxed(ctx->ctlr, base + GITS_CTLR);
>  		}
> +
> +		if (its->flags & ITS_FLAGS_WORKAROUND_GIC500_MAPC)
> +			its_cpu_init_collection(its);
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock(&its_lock);
>  }
> @@ -3395,7 +3420,7 @@ int its_cpu_init(void)
>  			return -ENXIO;
>  		}
>  		its_cpu_init_lpis();
> -		its_cpu_init_collection();
> +		its_cpu_init_collections();
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> 

I wonder if a better way to implement this is simply to bite the bullet
and implement the letter of the architecture:

If GITS_TYPER.HCC != 0, then collections 0...HCC-1 are held in HW, and
the rest in a SW-managed table. That would allow us to deal with this
without a quirk (which I asked for initially, apologies for changing my
mind).

We still the same DT flag to tell us we're going to be reset on suspend.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...