linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the s390 tree

From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Fri Feb 02 2018 - 21:04:03 EST

Next message: kbuild test robot: "Re: [PATCH] locking/qspinlock: Ensure node is initialised before updating prev->next"
Previous message: Alexei Starovoitov: "Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 0/5] libbpf: add XDP binding support"
Next in thread: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the s390 tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi all,

Commits

a39892ed47bf ("s390/runtime_instrumentation: re-add signum system call parameter")
279d2cea3aad ("s390/cio: fix kernel-doc usage")

are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Next message: kbuild test robot: "Re: [PATCH] locking/qspinlock: Ensure node is initialised before updating prev->next"
Previous message: Alexei Starovoitov: "Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 0/5] libbpf: add XDP binding support"
Next in thread: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the s390 tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]