Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the dma-mapping tree

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Wed Jan 17 2018 - 11:18:51 EST


On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 01:38:17PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> from the dma-mapping tree and commit:
>
> e80a0af4759a ("lib/scatterlist: Introduce sgl_alloc() and sgl_free()")
>
> from the block tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Thanks, the trivial fix look good.