Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:23:17 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > No. Keep it and lets next time coordinate the relevant bits and pieces
> > better. I reserve that bit 20 and let Linus sort out the trivial conflict
> > when merging the stuff.
> 
> I just picked that bit 20 when resolving the conflict.  The original patch used
> bit 11, so the resolution could use any other sensible bit.

20 is fine :)