Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] fs: fat: add ioctl method in fat filesystem driver

From: OGAWA Hirofumi
Date: Wed Dec 27 2017 - 08:30:01 EST


ChenGuanqiao <chen.chenchacha@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> +/* the characters in this field shall be d-characters, and unused byte shall be set to 0x20. */
> +static int fat_format_d_characters(char *label, unsigned long len)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i=0; i<len; ++i) {
> + switch (label[i]) {
> + case '0' ... '9':
> + case 'A' ... 'Z':
> + case '_':
> + continue;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + for (; i<len; ++i)
> + label[i] = 0x20;
> +
> + return len;
> +}

It should not accept and overwrite invalid char, return -EINVAL.

> +static int fat_ioctl_get_volume_label(struct inode *inode,
> + u8 __user *vol_label)
> +{
> + int err = 0;
> + struct fat_slot_info sinfo;
> +
> + err = fat_scan_volume_label(inode, &sinfo);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;

It needs to take inode read lock.

> + if (copy_to_user(vol_label, sinfo.de->name, MSDOS_NAME))
> + err = -EFAULT;
> +
> + brelse(sinfo.bh);
> +out:
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int fat_ioctl_set_volume_label(struct file *file,
> + u8 __user *vol_label)
> +{

[...]

> + b = (struct fat_boot_sector *)bh->b_data;
> +
> + lock_buffer(bh);

Probably, sb->s_umount to exclusive with remount update.

> + if (sbi->fat_bits == 32)
> + memcpy(b->fat32.vol_label, label, sizeof(label));
> + else
> + memcpy(b->fat16.vol_label, label, sizeof(label));
> +
> + mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
> + unlock_buffer(bh);
> + err = sync_dirty_buffer(bh);
> + brelse(bh);
> + if (err)
> + goto out_drop_file;

It should not update before preparing is done and checking error.

> + /* updates root directory's vol_label */
> + err = fat_scan_volume_label(inode, &sinfo);
> + if (err)
> + goto out_drop_file;

It should add entry if no volume label.

> + lock_buffer(bh);

inode write lock.

> + memcpy(sinfo.de->name, label, sizeof(sinfo.de->name));
> + mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
> + unlock_buffer(bh);

Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>