Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] cpufreq: schedutil: update CFS util only if used

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Wed Dec 13 2017 - 23:45:34 EST


On 07-12-17, 14:19, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> On 07-Dec 10:45, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 30-11-17, 15:57, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > > Yes, that's a pretty trivial update with a confusing changelog.
> > >
> > > If we think it's worth to keep (and correct as well) I'll update the
> > > commit message.
> >
> > We also need to update the commit log based on feedback from Vikram on
> > V2. Which said that the utilization can't change around the lock here
> > as we are within rq lock section, though max can change (maybe). So
> > this patch only takes care of locking before reading max.

I have more doubts on the max reason as well. Max isn't protected by the
sg_policy lock of schedutil and it can change any time. So even after moving
code around with this patch, we wouldn't fix any race and so I am not sure this
patch helps at all. But, I have sent the same diff for another reason now in my
series. Maybe I should have kept you as the author of that patch, but I forgot.
Will do that if I need to send a V2.

> Ok, right... will do.
>
> Thus you are still of the opinion to keep this patch in the series?

Yes, but we need a good reason for that :)

--
viresh