Re: [PATCH] On ppc64le we HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE

From: Torsten Duwe
Date: Tue Dec 12 2017 - 08:02:54 EST


On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 01:12:37PM +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>
> I think that this is not enough. You need to also implement
> save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable() for powerpc defined as __weak in
> kernel/stacktrace.c. See arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c for reference, but I
> think it would be much much simpler here given the changelog description.

Is there an exhaustive, definite, non-x86-centric description of the cases
this function needs to look for? Maybe some sort of formal specification?

Torsten