Re: [RFC PATCH] tpm: don't return -EINVAL if TPM command validation fails

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 07:14:21PM +0000, Roberts, William C wrote:

> I don't know why spaces would filter by command code. But it does
> seem to be loaded By getting the command codes from the tpm in
> tpm2_get_tpm_pt().

Ah, I forgot. So my remark is not quite right :\

> I don't think that itâs the right fix. I don't think the in-kernel
> RM should be filtering, but please enlighten my ignorance. Phillip
> did the userspace RM and understand the RM issues way better than I.

It needs to prevent unauthorized stuff from being sent to the TPM, so
if the kernel does not know how to parse the command it shouldn't send
it. It is a matter of security..

I can't remember if we synthezied responses for anything else, it
could make sense to return the usual not supported command response
for this specific thing. But the length error should remain EINVAL I
think..

Jason