[PATCH 4.4 19/28] ipip: only increase err_count for some certain type icmp in ipip_err

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx>


[ Upstream commit f3594f0a7ea36661d7fd942facd7f31a64245f1a ]

t->err_count is used to count the link failure on tunnel and an err
will be reported to user socket in tx path if t->err_count is not 0.
udp socket could even return EHOSTUNREACH to users.

Since commit fd58156e456d ("IPIP: Use ip-tunneling code.") removed
the 'switch check' for icmp type in ipip_err(), err_count would be
increased by the icmp packet with ICMP_EXC_FRAGTIME code. an link
failure would be reported out due to this.

In Jianlin's case, when receiving ICMP_EXC_FRAGTIME a icmp packet,
udp netperf failed with the err:
  send_data: data send error: No route to host (errno 113)

We expect this error reported from tunnel to socket when receiving
some certain type icmp, but not ICMP_EXC_FRAGTIME, ICMP_SR_FAILED
or ICMP_PARAMETERPROB ones.

This patch is to bring 'switch check' for icmp type back to ipip_err
so that it only reports link failure for the right type icmp, just as
in ipgre_err() and ipip6_err().

Fixes: fd58156e456d ("IPIP: Use ip-tunneling code.")
Reported-by: Jianlin Shi <jishi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/ipv4/ipip.c |   58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/ipip.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ipip.c
@@ -129,42 +129,68 @@ static struct rtnl_link_ops ipip_link_op
 static int ipip_err(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 info)
 {
 
-/* All the routers (except for Linux) return only
-   8 bytes of packet payload. It means, that precise relaying of
-   ICMP in the real Internet is absolutely infeasible.
- */
+	/* All the routers (except for Linux) return only
+	   8 bytes of packet payload. It means, that precise relaying of
+	   ICMP in the real Internet is absolutely infeasible.
+	 */
 	struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
 	struct ip_tunnel_net *itn = net_generic(net, ipip_net_id);
 	const struct iphdr *iph = (const struct iphdr *)skb->data;
-	struct ip_tunnel *t;
-	int err;
 	const int type = icmp_hdr(skb)->type;
 	const int code = icmp_hdr(skb)->code;
+	struct ip_tunnel *t;
+	int err = 0;
+
+	switch (type) {
+	case ICMP_DEST_UNREACH:
+		switch (code) {
+		case ICMP_SR_FAILED:
+			/* Impossible event. */
+			goto out;
+		default:
+			/* All others are translated to HOST_UNREACH.
+			 * rfc2003 contains "deep thoughts" about NET_UNREACH,
+			 * I believe they are just ether pollution. --ANK
+			 */
+			break;
+		}
+		break;
+
+	case ICMP_TIME_EXCEEDED:
+		if (code != ICMP_EXC_TTL)
+			goto out;
+		break;
+
+	case ICMP_REDIRECT:
+		break;
+
+	default:
+		goto out;
+	}
 
-	err = -ENOENT;
 	t = ip_tunnel_lookup(itn, skb->dev->ifindex, TUNNEL_NO_KEY,
 			     iph->daddr, iph->saddr, 0);
-	if (!t)
+	if (!t) {
+		err = -ENOENT;
 		goto out;
+	}
 
 	if (type == ICMP_DEST_UNREACH && code == ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED) {
-		ipv4_update_pmtu(skb, dev_net(skb->dev), info,
-				 t->parms.link, 0, IPPROTO_IPIP, 0);
-		err = 0;
+		ipv4_update_pmtu(skb, net, info, t->parms.link, 0,
+				 iph->protocol, 0);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
 	if (type == ICMP_REDIRECT) {
-		ipv4_redirect(skb, dev_net(skb->dev), t->parms.link, 0,
-			      IPPROTO_IPIP, 0);
-		err = 0;
+		ipv4_redirect(skb, net, t->parms.link, 0, iph->protocol, 0);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	if (t->parms.iph.daddr == 0)
+	if (t->parms.iph.daddr == 0) {
+		err = -ENOENT;
 		goto out;
+	}
 
-	err = 0;
 	if (t->parms.iph.ttl == 0 && type == ICMP_TIME_EXCEEDED)
 		goto out;