Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/intel_sdvo: mark expected switch fall-throughs

From: Jani Nikula
Date: Thu Nov 09 2017 - 03:20:05 EST


On Wed, 08 Nov 2017, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141432
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141433
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141434
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141435
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141436
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
> index 7437944..921e372 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
> @@ -1327,6 +1327,7 @@ static void intel_sdvo_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder,
> switch (crtc_state->pixel_multiplier) {
> default:
> WARN(1, "unknown pixel multiplier specified\n");
> + /* fall through */
> case 1: rate = SDVO_CLOCK_RATE_MULT_1X; break;
> case 2: rate = SDVO_CLOCK_RATE_MULT_2X; break;
> case 4: rate = SDVO_CLOCK_RATE_MULT_4X; break;
> @@ -2274,15 +2275,15 @@ intel_sdvo_guess_ddc_bus(struct intel_sdvo *sdvo)
> */
> switch (sdvo->controlled_output) {
> case SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS1:
> - mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS1;
> + mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS1; /* fall through */
> case SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS0:
> - mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS0;
> + mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_LVDS0; /* fall through */
> case SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS1:
> - mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS1;
> + mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS1; /* fall through */
> case SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS0:
> - mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS0;
> + mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_TMDS0; /* fall through */
> case SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB1:
> - mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB1;
> + mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB1; /* fall through */
> case SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB0:
> mask |= SDVO_OUTPUT_RGB0;
> break;

--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center