Re: [PATCH 1/3] clocksource/mips-gic-timer: Fix rcu_sched timeouts from multithreading

From: Matt Redfearn
Date: Thu Oct 19 2017 - 04:14:54 EST



On 18/10/17 21:34, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017, Matt Redfearn wrote:

When the MIPS GIC clockevent code was written, it appears to have
inherited the 0x300 cycle min delta from the MIPS CPU timer driver. This
is suboptimal for two reasons.

Firstly, the CPU timer counts once every other cycle (i.e. half the
clock rate). The GIC counts once per clock. Assuming that the GIC and
CPU share the same clock this means the GIC is counting twice as fast,
and so the min delta should be (at least) doubled. Fix this by doubling
the min delta to 0x600.

Secondly, the fixed min delta ignores the fact that with MIPS
multithreading active, execution resource within a core is shared
between the hardware threads within that core. An inconvenienly timed
switch of executing thread within gic_next_event, between the read and
write of updated count, can result in the CPU writing an event in the
past, and subsequently not receiving a tick interrupt until the counter
wraps. This stalls the CPU from the RCU scheduler. Other CPUs detect
this and print rcu_sched timeout messages in the kernel log. It can
lead to other issues as well if the CPU is holding locks or other
resources at the point at which it stalls. Fix this by scaling the min
delta for the timer based on the number of threads in the core
(smp_num_siblings). This accounts for the greater average runtime of
CPUs within a multithreading core.
I don't understand why this is not catched by the check at the end of the
next_event() function:

res = ((int)(gic_read_count() - cnt) >= 0) ? -ETIME : 0;

Btw, the local_irq_save() in this function is pointless as this function is
always called with interrupts disabled from the core code.

Thanks,

tglx



Hi tglx,

This is an issue because in some cases (hrtimer_reprogram -> clockevents_program_event -> clockevents_program_min_delta, when CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_MIN_ADJUST=n) there is no retry performed in the case of -ETIME. There has been a patch pending for some time https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8909491/ which ought to address this and retry in the case of an event in the past on this call path. But in the meantime this patch vastly improves the situation.

Thanks,
Matt