Re: [PATCH 0/4] char-TPM: Adjustments for ten function implementations

From: SF Markus Elfring
Date: Tue Oct 17 2017 - 05:31:42 EST

Next message: Ard Biesheuvel: "Re: ARM64: Regression with commit e3067861ba66 ("arm64: add basic VMAP_STACK support")"
Previous message: Mark Rutland: "Re: ARM64: Regression with commit e3067861ba66 ("arm64: add basic VMAP_STACK support")"
In reply to: Jarkko Sakkinen: "Re: [PATCH 0/4] char-TPM: Adjustments for ten function implementations"
Next in thread: James Bottomley: "Re: [PATCH 0/4] char-TPM: Adjustments for ten function implementations"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Fixes is only for bug fixes. These don't fix any bugs.

How do you distinguish these in questionable source code
from other error categories or software weaknesses?

Regards,
Markus

Next message: Ard Biesheuvel: "Re: ARM64: Regression with commit e3067861ba66 ("arm64: add basic VMAP_STACK support")"
Previous message: Mark Rutland: "Re: ARM64: Regression with commit e3067861ba66 ("arm64: add basic VMAP_STACK support")"
In reply to: Jarkko Sakkinen: "Re: [PATCH 0/4] char-TPM: Adjustments for ten function implementations"
Next in thread: James Bottomley: "Re: [PATCH 0/4] char-TPM: Adjustments for ten function implementations"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]