Re: [PATCH] EDAC, sb_edac: mark expected switch fall-through

[Gustavo A. R. Silva]

Quoting Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>:

> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:00:53AM +0000, Zhuo, Qiuxu wrote:
> > Hi Silva,
> >
> >     The actual intention of the code is NOT to fall through, though  
> > current code can work correctly.
> >     Thanks for this finding. If you don't mind, I'll submit a fix  
> > patch for it with the tag 'Reported-by:' by you.
>
> I'd prefer if Gustavo would submit a patch fixing that, as he caught it
> and I'd prefer if you don't top-post on public mailing lists please.

I can do that. I will send a patch shortly.

Thanks
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva