Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.50-stable review

From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Thu Sep 14 2017 - 01:34:47 EST


On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 04:18:03AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 02:30:46PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > Yes. I don't recall if it is a direct --force or if you would have to
> > > remove the original tag first (with git push <repo> :refs/tags/<tag>).
> >
> > Ah, but then if someone had pulled the old tag, they would have to
> > delete it locally before they can pull in the new one. That's the main
> > reason I'll not do this...
>
> In fact not, the tags are automatically replaced upon pull. I've been
> using such a crappy workflow for some time in the past, sharing human
> errors with coworkers... Git is pretty tolerant to this. It's just
> that it's terribly confusing because you can then have two people with
> the same tag name pointing to different commit IDs, I really hate this,
> it only works when all users are in the same office and you shout
> "sorry I messed up, I'm pushing the tag again".
>
> > Again, use the make command that we have just for this reason...
>
> It also has the benefit of always reporting the same version for all
> users including those only downloading the -rc patch.
>
It reports the same version, but it is not necessarily the same code.
There are cases where a rc is updated, but not the Makefile. That happens
quite a lot, actually. This is similar to mainline, which currently
claims to be v4.13.0 until -rc1, then it claims to be -rc1 until -rc2,
and so on.

Guenter