Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: typec: tcpm: Validate source and sink caps

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 10:29:52AM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 06:22:13PM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> >> The source and sink caps should follow the following rules.
> >> This patch validates whether the src_caps/snk_caps adheres
> >> to it.
> >>
> >> 6.4.1 Capabilities Message
> >> A Capabilities message (Source Capabilities message or Sink
> >> Capabilities message) shall have at least one Power
> >> Data Object for vSafe5V. The Capabilities message shall also
> >> contain the sending Portâs information followed by up to
> >> 6 additional Power Data Objects. Power Data Objects in a
> >> Capabilities message shall be sent in the following order:
> >>
> >> 1. The vSafe5V Fixed Supply Object shall always be the first object.
> >> 2. The remaining Fixed Supply Objects, if present, shall be sent
> >>    in voltage order; lowest to highest.
> >> 3. The Battery Supply Objects, if present shall be sent in Minimum
> >>    Voltage order; lowest to highest.
> >> 4. The Variable Supply (non-battery) Objects, if present, shall be
> >>    sent in Minimum Voltage order; lowest to highest.
> >>
> >> Errors in source/sink_caps of the local port will prevent
> >> the port registration. Whereas, errors in source caps of partner
> >> device would only log them.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <Badhri@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/staging/typec/pd.h   |   2 +
> >>  drivers/staging/typec/tcpm.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >>  drivers/staging/typec/tcpm.h |  16 +++----
> >>  3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > Before you add more stuff to this driver, what is needed to get it out
> > of staging?  That would be more useful to do now, right?
> 
> Actually not adding more features here. There was a bug where
> the phone wasnt charging at the highest possible power output,
> came up with the these patches while debugging that issue.

Ok, but again, when is this going to get out of staging?