RE: [PATCH 3/3] ACPI / scan: Enable GPEs before scanning the namespace

From: Zheng, Lv
Date: Wed Aug 16 2017 - 22:26:18 EST


Hi, Rafael

> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ACPI / scan: Enable GPEs before scanning the namespace
>
> On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 4:12:24 AM CEST Zheng, Lv wrote:
> > Hi, Rafael
> >
> > > From: linux-acpi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-acpi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Rafael J.
> > > Wysocki
> > > Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ACPI / scan: Enable GPEs before scanning the namespace
> > >
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > On some systems the platform firmware expects GPEs to be enabled
> > > before the enumeration of devices and if that expectation is not
> > > met, the systems in question may not boot in some situations.
> > >
> > > For this reason, change the initialization ordering of the ACPI
> > > subsystem to make it enable GPEs before scanning the namespace
> > > for the first time in order to enumerate devices.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Suggested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 8 ++++----
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > > +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > > @@ -2139,6 +2139,10 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
> > > acpi_get_spcr_uart_addr();
> > > }
> > >
> > > + acpi_gpe_apply_masked_gpes();
> > > + acpi_update_all_gpes();
> > > + acpi_ec_ecdt_start();
> > > +
> >
> > Just for your information.
> > A recent internal bug reveals that acpi_ec_ecdt_start() should only be
> > invoked after the enumeration (acpi_ec_add()) for now.
> > The function contains logics that need to be altered by acpi_ec_add().
> >
> > So it seems we can only do less aggressive change by moving the GPE
> > related 2 lines up.
>
> OK, done.
>
> Please check my linux-next branch and see if that's what it should be.

I confirmed.
And refreshed my EC regression fix on top of that with v2 tagged in the subjects.

Thanks and best regards
Lv