Re: [PATCH v7 9/9] sparc64: Add support for ADI (Application Data Integrity)

From: Khalid Aziz
Date: Wed Aug 16 2017 - 10:47:00 EST


On 08/15/2017 10:58 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 15:26:02 -0600

+void adi_restore_tags(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ unsigned long addr, pte_t pte)
+{
...
+ tag = tag_start(addr, tag_desc);
+ paddr = pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_PADDR_4V;
+ for (tmp = paddr; tmp < (paddr+PAGE_SIZE); tmp += adi_blksize()) {
+ version1 = (*tag) >> 4;
+ version2 = (*tag) & 0x0f;
+ *tag++ = 0;
+ asm volatile("stxa %0, [%1] %2\n\t"
+ :
+ : "r" (version1), "r" (tmp),
+ "i" (ASI_MCD_REAL));
+ tmp += adi_blksize();
+ asm volatile("stxa %0, [%1] %2\n\t"
+ :
+ : "r" (version2), "r" (tmp),
+ "i" (ASI_MCD_REAL));
+ }
+ asm volatile("membar #Sync\n\t");

You do a membar here.

+ for (i = pfrom; i < (pfrom + PAGE_SIZE); i += adi_blksize()) {
+ asm volatile("ldxa [%1] %2, %0\n\t"
+ : "=r" (adi_tag)
+ : "r" (i), "i" (ASI_MCD_REAL));
+ asm volatile("stxa %0, [%1] %2\n\t"
+ :
+ : "r" (adi_tag), "r" (pto),
+ "i" (ASI_MCD_REAL));

But not here.

Is this OK? I suspect you need to add a membar this this second piece
of MCD tag storing code.

Hi Dave,

You are right. This tag storing code needs membar as well. I will add that.

Thanks,
Khalid