Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] ghes_edac: avoid multiple calls to dmi_walk()

[Kani, Toshimitsu]

On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 17:50 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 03:35:51PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> > ghes_edac instantiates an mci as a pseudo device representing a
> > GHES error source.ÂÂEach error source associates with all DIMMs,
> > and may report errors independently.ÂÂAs ghes_edac is an GHES
> > error-reporting wrapper to edac, this abstraction makes sense.
> 
> Bullshit.
> 
> An MCI is a memory controller descriptor. That doesn't fit the GHES
> platform devices that get probed. GHES platform device != MCI. How
> many times do I need to say this for it to get through to you?

Right, but it has to be a "pseudo" device for ghes_edac.  There is no
memory controller info available.  A single mci does not make it a real
memory controller, either.

> > I do not see a problem in having counters for each GHES error
> > source.
> 
> And the error counters of that "simulated" mci get incremented
> depending on which pointer gets passed in from GHES? More bullshit.
>
> > This is just statistics info, and ghes_edac does not expect any OS
> > action from the counters.
> 
> So let me know if you don't want to do it and rather would prefer to
> pointlessly debate. I certainly don't want to waste my time debating.

Yes, ghes_edac refactoring like this should be considered a separate
item.  My patchset is aimed to introduce a platform-check to attach
ghes_edac on supported platforms.

Thanks,
-Toshi