Re: [PATCH] watchdog: dw_wdt: fix overflow issue in dw_wdt_top_in_seconds

[Guenter Roeck]

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 08:50:43PM +0800, Huibin Hong wrote:
> If top is 15, (1 << (16 + top)) may be negative.
> 
> Change-Id: I76e4a603a54f093e64a4b266008570e3afcdb35a

No Change-Id in upstream patches, please.

> Signed-off-by: Huibin Hong <huibin.hong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I am having trouble applying this patch. What is its baseline version ?

Guenter

> ---
>  drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> index 6ea0634..059c974 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,9 @@ static inline int dw_wdt_top_in_seconds(unsigned top)
>  	 * There are 16 possible timeout values in 0..15 where the number of
>  	 * cycles is 2 ^ (16 + i) and the watchdog counts down.
>  	 */
> -	return (1 << (16 + top)) / clk_get_rate(dw_wdt.clk);
> +	unsigned int cycles = 1 << (16 + top);
> +
> +	return cycles / clk_get_rate(dw_wdt.clk);
>  }
>  
>  static int dw_wdt_get_top(void)
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html