Re: [Linux-ima-devel] [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] tpm: improve tpm_tis send() performance by ignoring burstcount

From: Ken Goldman
Date: Fri Aug 11 2017 - 17:42:15 EST


Following up on this thread based on this week's TCG call ...

1 - burstCount can safely be ignored on writes. This is explicit in
most places in the TCG spec. In places where it is not explicit, it was simply an editorial omission. We are going through the spec and adding "without incurring wait states."

TCG is willing to publish an errata if that makes developers more comfortable.

2 - These are multi-mhz buses. The TPM vendors conformed that wait states, even if incurred, will be sub-usec. I.e., less that a microsecond.

Essentially, the DD is loading the FIFO, and the TPM is unloading the FIFO at processor speeds.

Thus, even if one were worried about an odd system new enough to have a TPM, but old enough to have an LPC attached printer, keyboard, mouse or floppy, the delay in printing or typing will be insignificant.

3 - I asked several platform vendors with long TCG experience, and they said that they know of no motherboards that share the LPC bus with a TPM plus another device.